4.7 Article

Growth of Lung Parenchyma in Infants and Toddlers with Chronic Lung Disease of Infancy

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200908-1190OC

Keywords

pulmonary diffusing capacity; alveolar volume; lung parenchyma; bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Funding

  1. NIH [HL054062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: The clinical pathology describing infants with chronic lung disease of infancy (CLDI) has been limited and obtained primarily from infants with severe lung disease, who either died or required lung biopsy. As lung tissue from clinically stable outpatients is not available, physiological measurements offer the potential to increase our understanding of the pulmonary pathophysiology of this disease. Objectives: We hypothesized that if premature birth and the development of CLDI result in disruption of alveolar development, then infants and toddlers with CLDI would have a lower pulmonary diffusing capacity relative to their alveolar volume compared with full-term control subjects. Methods: We measured pulmonary diffusing capacity and alveolar volume, using a single breath-hold maneuver at elevated lung volume. Subjects with chronic lung disease of infancy (23-29 wk of gestation; n = 39) were compared with full-term control subjects (n = 61) at corrected ages of 11.6 (4.8-17.0) and 13.6 (3.2-33) months, respectively. Measurements and Main Results: Alveolar volume and pulmonary diffusing capacity increased with increasing body length for both groups. After adjusting for body length, subjects with CLDI had significantly lower pulmonary diffusing capacity (2.88 vs. 3.23 ml/min/mm Hg; P = 0.0004), but no difference in volume (545 vs. 555 ml; P = 0.58). Conclusions: Infants and toddlers with CLDI have decreased pulmonary diffusing capacity, but normal alveolar volume. These physiological findings are consistent with the morphometric data obtained from subjects with severe lung disease, which suggests an impairment of alveolar development after very premature birth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available