4.7 Article

Tension-Time Index as a Predictor of Extubation Outcome in Ventilated Children

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1725OC

Keywords

diaphragm; respiratory muscles; pediatric critical care; weaning

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [067882/Z/02/Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Indices that assess the load on the respiratory muscles, such as the tension-time index (TTI), may predict extubation outcome. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a noninvasive assessment of TTI, the respiratory muscle tension time index (TTmus), by comparison to that of the diaphragm tension time index (TTdi) and other predictors of extubation outcome in ventilated children. Methods: Eighty children (median [range] age 2.1 yr [0.15-161) admitted to pediatric intensive care units at King's College and St Mary's Hospitals who required mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were studied. Measurements and Main Results: TTmus, maximal inspiratory pressure, respiratory drive, respiratory system mechanics, and functional residual capacity using a helium dilution technique, the rapid shallow breathing and CROP indices (compliance, rate, oxygenation, and pressure) indexed for body weight were measured and standard clinical data recorded in all patients. TTdi was measured in 28 of the 80 children using balloon catheters. Eight children (three in the TTdi group) failed extubation. TTmus (0.199 vs. 0.09) and TTdi (0.157 vs. 0.07) were significantly higher in children who failed extubation. TTmus greater than 0.18 (n = 80) and TTdi greater than 0.15 (n = 28) had sensitivities and specificities of 100% in predicting extubation failure. The other predictors performed less well. Conclusions: Invasive and noninvasive measurements of TTI may provide accurate prediction of extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available