4.5 Article

Heads or tails? Stressor-specific expression of corticotropin-eleasing factor and urotensin I in the preoptic area and caudal neurosecretory system of rainbow trout

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 196, Issue 3, Pages 637-648

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1677/JOE-07-0568

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)- and urotensin I (UI)-expressing cells of the preoptic area (POA) and caudal neurosecretory system (CNSS) are considered key contributors to the regulation of the stress response in fish; however, the expression pattern of these neurons to environmental and social challenges have not been compared in a single study. Therefore, we characterized in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) the central distribution of CRF and UI expression and quantified the POA and CNSS mRNA levels of both transcripts in response to hyperammonemia, hypoxia, isolation, or subordination. The tissue distribution demonstrated that the POA and the CNSS are dominant sites of CRF and UI expression. Comparison of the plasma cortisol levels in response to the diverse treatments showed that Subordination was the most severe stressor followed by hyperammonemia, isolation, and hypoxia. In the POA, with the exception of subordination that had no effect on UI expression, all stressors resulted in increase in CRF and UI mRNA levels. In the CNSS, while hyperammonemia was associated with increase in CRF and UI mRNA levels, and hypoxia induced an increase in CRF expression, isolation caused a decrease in the expression of both transcripts, and subordination had no effect. Independent of the stressor, we found strong positive correlations between CRF and UI expression in the POA and the CNSS, and no correlation in the expression of either gene between regions. Overall, the results demonstrate that the contribution of POA and CNSS CRF and UI neurons to the stress response in rainbow trout is stressor-, time-, and region-specific.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available