4.6 Article

Dexamethasone suppresses infiltration of RhoA+ cells into early lesions of rat traumatic brain injury

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
Volume 115, Issue 3, Pages 335-343

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-007-0301-y

Keywords

RhoA; dexamethasone; traumatic brain injury; microglia; macrophages; weight-drop model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammatory cell infiltration is a major part of secondary tissue damage in traumatic brain injury (TBI). RhoA is an important member of Rho GTPases and is involved in leukocyte migration. Inhibition of RhoA and its downstream target, Rho-associated coiled kinase (ROCK), has been proven to promote axon regeneration and function recovery following injury in the central nervous system (CNS). Previously, we showed that dexamethasone, an immunosuppressive corticosteroid, attenuated early expression of three molecules associated with microglia/macrophages activation following TBI in rats. Here, the effects of dexamethasone on the early expression of RhoA have been investigated in brains of TBI rats by immunohistochemistry. In brains of rats treated with TBI alone, significant RhoA(+) cell accumulation was observed at 18 h post-injury and continuously increased during our observed time period. The accumulated RhoA(+) cells were distributed to the areas of pannecrosis and selective neuronal loss. Most accumulated RhoA(+) cells were identified as active microglia/macrophages by double-labelling. Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg body weight) was intraperitoneally injected on day 0 and 2 immediately following brain injury. Numbers of RhoA(+) cells were significantly reduced on day 1 and 2 following administration of dexamethasone but returned to vehicle control level on day 4. However, dexamethasone treatment did not change the proportion of RhoA(+) cells. These observations suggest that dexamethasone has only a transient effect on early leukocyte recruitment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available