4.6 Review

Relationship Between Diet and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 104, Issue 10, Pages E31-E42

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302110

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1052865, 1012472, 628912]
  2. NHMRC [1059660]
  3. Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Meat and Livestock Australia
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Cooperative Research Centre
  7. Simons Autism Foundation
  8. Cancer Council of Victoria
  9. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  10. Medical Benefits Fund
  11. NHMRC
  12. Beyond Blue
  13. Rotary Health
  14. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  15. Bristol Myers Squibb
  16. Eli Lilly
  17. Glaxo SmithKline
  18. Organon
  19. Novartis
  20. Mayne Pharma
  21. Servier
  22. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute
  23. Australian Rotary Health
  24. Ian Potter Foundation
  25. University of Melbourne
  26. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  27. Janssen Cilag
  28. Pfizer
  29. Health Ed
  30. Network Nutrition
  31. Deakin University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We systematically reviewed 12 epidemiological studies to determine whether an association exists between diet quality and patterns and mental health in children and adolescents; 9 explored the relationship using diet as the exposure, and 3 used mental health as the exposure. We found evidence of a significant, cross-sectional relationship between unhealthy dietary patterns and poorer mental health in children and adolescents. We observed a consistent trend for the relationship between goodquality diet and better mental health and some evidence for the reverse. When including only the 7 studies deemed to be of high methodological quality, all but 1 of these trends remained. Findings highlight the potential importance of the relationship between dietary patterns or quality and mental health early in the life span.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available