4.6 Article

Indicators of Victimization and Sexual Orientation Among Adolescents: Analyses From Youth Risk Behavior Surveys

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages 255-261

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301493

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R21HD051178]
  2. Fitch Nesbitt Endowment, Frances McClelland Institute for Children, Youth, and Families
  3. Office of Research on Women's Health [K12HD055892]
  4. NICHW [K12HD055892]
  5. IMPACT LGBT Health and Development Program, Northwestern University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We used nuanced measures of sexual minority status to examine disparities in victimization and their variations by gender, age, and race/ethnicity. Methods. We conducted multivariate analyses of pooled data from the 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. Results. Although all sexual minorities reported more fighting, skipping school because they felt unsafe, and having property stolen or damaged at school than did heterosexuals, rates were highest among youths who identified as bisexual or who reported both male and female sexual partners. Gender differences among sexual minorities appeared to be concentrated among bisexuals and respondents who reported sexual partners of both genders. Sexual minority youths reported more fighting than heterosexual youths, especially at younger ages, and more nonphysical school victimization that persisted through adolescence. White and Hispanic sexual minority youths reported more indicators of victimization than did heterosexuals; we found few sexual minority differences among African American and Asian American youths. Conclusions. Victimization carries health consequences, and sexual minorities are at increased risk. Surveys should include measures that allow tracking of disparities in victimization by sexual minority status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available