4.6 Article

Directly Observed Antidepressant Medication Treatment and HIV Outcomes Among Homeless and Marginally Housed HIV-Positive Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 308-315

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300422

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [R01 MH 63011-01A1, K24 MH-087227]
  2. NIMH [R01 MH-054907]
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholars Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We assessed whether directly observed fluoxetine treatment reduced depression symptom severity and improved HIV outcomes among homeless and marginally housed HIV-positive adults in San Francisco, California, from 2002 to 2008. Methods. We conducted a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of once-weekly fluoxetine, directly observed for 24 weeks, then self-administered for 12 weeks (n=137 persons with major or minor depressive disorder or dysthymia). Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score was the primary outcome. Response was a 50% reduction from baseline and remission a score below 8. Secondary measures were Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score, antiretroviral uptake, antiretroviral adherence (measured by unannounced pill count), and HIV-1 RNA viral suppression (<50 copies/mL). Results. The intervention reduced depression symptom severity (b=-1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.85, -3.08; P<.001) and increased response (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.40; 95% CI=1.86, 3.10; P<.001) and remission (AOR=2.97; 95% CI=1.29, 3.87; P<.001). BDI-II results were similar. We observed no statistically significant differences in secondary HIV outcomes. Conclusions. Directly observed fluoxetine may be an effective depression treatment strategy for HIV-positive homeless and marginally housed adults, a vulnerable population with multiple barriers to adherence. (Am J Public Health. 2013;103:308-315. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300422)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available