4.6 Article

Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Homelessness and the Impact of Axis I and II Disorders

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages S275-S281

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301323

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [152348]
  2. Manitoba Health Research Council Chair award
  3. The Mental Health Commission of Canada At Home/Chez Soi Project
  4. Manitoba Health Research Council Establishment Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We investigated the links between homelessness associated with serious mental and physical healthy disparities and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in nationally representative data, with Axis I and II disorders as potential mediators. Methods. We examined data from the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions in 2001-2002 and 2004-2005, and included 34 653 participants representative of the noninstitutionalized US population who were 20 years old or older. We studied the variables related to 4 classes of Axis I disorders, all 10 Axis II personality disorders, a wide range of ACEs, and a lifetime history of homelessness. Results. Analyses revealed high prevalences of each ACE in individuals experiencing lifetime homelessness (17%-60%). A mediation model with Axis I and II disorders determined that childhood adversities were significantly related to homelessness through direct effects (adjusted odd ratios = 2.04, 4.24) and indirect effects, indicating partial mediation. Population attributable fractions were also reported. Conclusions. Although Axis I and II disorders partially mediated the relationship between ACEs and homelessness, a strong direct association remained. This novel finding has implications for interventions and policy. Additional research is needed to understand relevant causal pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available