4.6 Article

Protecting Young People From Junk Food Advertising: Implications of Psychological Research for First Amendment Law

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 214-222

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300328

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (through the National Policy & Legal Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity)
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (through the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity)
  3. Rudd Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the United States, one third of children and adolescents are overweight or obese, yet food and beverage companies continue to target them with advertising for products that contribute to this obesity crisis. When government restrictions on such advertising are proposed, the constitutional commercial speech doctrine is often invoked as a barrier to action. We explore incongruities between the legal justifications for the commercial speech doctrine and the psychological research on how food advertising affects young people. A proper interpretation of the First Amendment should leave room for regulations to protect young people from advertising featuring calorie-dense, nutrient-poor foods and beverages. (Am J Public Health. 2012;102:214-222. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300328)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available