4.6 Article

Disproportionate Proximity to Environmental Health Hazards: Methods, Models, and Measurement

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages S27-S36

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency
  2. National Institute for Environmental Health Science
  3. National Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities
  4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Cooperative Remote Sensing Science and Technology Center
  5. South Bronx Environmental Justice Partnership
  6. Bronx Center to Reduce and Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
  7. Montefiore Medical Center
  8. Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  9. Professional Staff Congress City University of New York (CUNY)
  10. George N. Shuster Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to provide a historical overview of methods, models, and data used in the environmental justice (EJ) research literature to measure proximity to environmental hazards and potential exposure to their adverse health effects. We explored how the assessment of disproportionate proximity and exposure has evolved from comparing the prevalence of minority or low-income residents in geographic entities hosting pollution sources and discrete buffer zones to more refined techniques that use continuous distances, pollutant fate-and-transport models, and estimates of health risk from toxic exposure. We also reviewed analytical techniques used to determine the characteristics of people residing in areas potentially exposed to environmental hazards and emerging geostatistical techniques that are more appropriate for EJ analysis than conventional statistical methods. We concluded by providing several recommendations regarding future research and data needs for EJ assessment that would lead to more reliable results and policy solutions. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:S27-S36. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.300109)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available