4.6 Article

Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages S246-S254

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Western Washington University
  2. Huxley College of the Environment's Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and health equity analysis methodologies. It was hypothesized that Seattle's industrial air toxic exposure risk was unevenly dispersed, that gentrification stratified the city's neighborhoods, and that the inequities of both converged. Methods. Spatial characterizations of air toxic pollution risk exposures from 1990 to 2007 were combined with longitudinal cluster analysis of census block groups in Seattle, Washington, from 1990 to 2000. Results. A cluster of air toxic exposure inequality and socioeconomic inequity converged in 1 area of south central Seattle. Minority and working class residents were more concentrated in the same neighborhoods near Seattle's worst industrial pollution risks. Conclusions. Not all pollution was distributed equally in a dynamic urban landscape. Using techniques to examine skewed riskscapes and socioeconomic urban geographies provided a foundation for future research on the connections among environmental health hazard sources, socially vulnerable neighborhoods, and health inequity. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:S246-S254. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available