4.6 Article

Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Identify Health Concerns in an African American Community

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages 2087-2092

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.191775

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R24MD001594]
  2. National Cancer Institute [R01CA132656]
  3. National Center for Research Resources [RR024133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We used qualitative and quantitative data collection methods to identify the health concerns of African American residents in an urban community and analyzed the extent to which there were consistencies across methods in the concerns identified. Methods. We completed 9 focus groups with 51 residents, 27 key informant interviews, and 201 community health surveys with a random sample of community residents to identify the health issues participants considered of greatest importance. We then compared the issues identified through these methods. Results. Focus group participants and key informants gave priority to cancer and cardiovascular diseases, but most respondents in the community health survey indicated that sexually transmitted diseases, substance abuse, and obesity were conditions in need of intervention. How respondents ranked their concerns varied in the qualitative versus the quantitative methods. Conclusions. Using qualitative and quantitative approaches simultaneously is useful in determining community health concerns. Although quantitative approaches yield concrete evidence of community needs, qualitative approaches provide a context for how these issues can be addressed. Researchers should develop creative ways to address multiple issues that arise when using a mixed-methods approach. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2087-2092. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.191775)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available