4.6 Article

Financial Strain and Smoking Cessation Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Smokers

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages 702-706

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.172676

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01-DA014818]
  2. National Cancer Institute [R25T-CA57730, K07-CA121037]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [K01-DP001120, K01-DP000086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We evaluated the influence of financial strain on smoking cessation among Latino, African American, and Caucasian smokers of predominantly low socioeconomic status. Methods. Smokers enrolled in a smoking cessation study (N = 424) were followed from 1 week prequit through 26 weeks postquit. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between baseline financial strain and smoking abstinence at 26 weeks postcluit after control for age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational level, annual household income, marital status, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and time to first cigarette of the day. Results. Greater financial strain at baseline was significantly associated with reduced odds of abstinence at 26 weeks postquit among those who completed the study (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CII = 0.62, 0.94; P = .01). There was a significant association as well in analyses that included those who completed the study in addition to those lost to follow-up who were categorized as smokers (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.96; P = .02). Conclusions. Greater financial strain predicted lower cessation rates among racially/ethnically diverse smokers. Our findings highlight the impact of economic concerns on smoking cessation and the need to address financial strain in smoking cessation interventions. (Am J Public Health. 2010;100:702-706. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.172676)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available