4.6 Article

Unfair treatment, racial/ethnic discrimination, ethnic identification, and smoking among Asian Americans in the National Latino and Asian American study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 485-492

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.102012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R24 HD042828-10, R24 HD042828] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [U01 MH062209, U01-MH062207, U01-MH062209, U01 MH062207, P01 MH059876, P01-MH059876] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We examined the relations of self-report of general unfair treatment and self-report of race/ethnicity-specific discrimination with current smoking among Asian Americans. We investigated whether ethnic identification moderated either association. Methods. Weighted logistic regressions were performed among 1977 Asian Americans recruited to the National Latino and Asian American Study (2002-2003). Results. In weighted multivariate logistic regression models including both general unfair treatment and racial/ethnic discrimination, odds of current smoking were higher among Asian Americans who reported high levels of unfair treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 2.80; 95% confidence interval [01 = 1.13, 6.95) and high levels of racial/ethnic discrimination (OR=2.40; 95% CI=0.94, 6.12) compared with those who reported no unfair treatment and discrimination, respectively. High levels of ethnic identification moderated racial/ethnic discrimination (F-3 = 3.25; P= .03). High levels of ethnic identification were associated with lower probability of current smoking among participants reporting high levels of racial/ethnic discrimination. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that experiences of unfair treatment and racial/ethnic discrimination are risk factors for smoking among Asian Americans. Efforts to promote ethnic identification may be effective in mitigating the influence of racial/ethnic discrimination on smoking in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available