4.4 Article

Tolerance response to iron chlorosis of Prunus selections as rootstocks

Journal

HORTSCIENCE
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 304-309

Publisher

AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.2.304

Keywords

ferric chelate reductase; hydroponics; SPAD

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of rootstocks tolerant to iron deficiency represents the best alternative to prevent Fe chlorosis for peach production in calcareous soils. Early detection laboratory screening procedures allow the selection of new Fe-efficient rootstock genotypes. Seventeen Prunus rootstocks were tested for root ferric chelate reductase (FC-R) enzymatic activity, leaf SPAD values, and field performance. Some rootstocks were used as a reference to compare with new Prunus selections. Micropropagated plants were grown in hydroponic culture with half-strength Hoagland's nutrient solution containing 90 mu M Fe(III)-EDTA as a control treatment. Plants were transferred to iron-free fresh solutions for 4 days and were thereafter resupplied with 180 mu M Fe(III)-EDTA for 1 or 2 days. In vivo FC-R activity was measured in all treatments, i.e., control, Fe-deficient, and 180 mu M Fe(III)-EDTA resupplied plants. The FC-R activity after Fe resupply was higher in Fe-efficient genotypes such as Adesoto(PVP), Felinem(PVP), GF 677, Krymsk 86(TM), and PAC 9921-07 than in the controls. No induction of FC-R activity was found in other genotypes such as Barrier, Cadaman(TM)-Avimag(PVP), PAC 9907-23, and PAC 9908-02. An intermediate response was observed in Garnem(PVP), Gisela 5(PVP), Krymsk 1(PVP), Torinel(TM)-Avifel(PVP), VSL-2(TM), and PAC 9904-01. According to the induction of FC-R activity after Fe resupply, genotypes were classified as tolerant, moderately tolerant, or nontolerant to iron-induced chlorosis. These results were compared with SPAD values of plants grown under controlled conditions and in the nursery. Rootstocks that show high induction of FC-R activity also showed high or very high SPAD values in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available