4.6 Article

Close coupling between astrocytic and neuronal metabolisms to fulfill anaplerotic and energy needs in the rat brain

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 712-724

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600568

Keywords

astrocyte; brain energy; brain metabolism; neuron; NMR spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon metabolism in the rat brain was studied in animals anesthetized with a light dose of pentobarbital and in awake animals under morphine, which were infused with either [1-C-13] glucose + acetate or glucose + [2-C-13] acetate for various periods of time. Brain amino-acid enrichments in tissue extracts were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and their time evolution was analyzed by automatic fitting. Acetyl-coenzyme A C2 enrichment and ratio between pyruvate carboxylase and pyruvate dehydrogenase activity (PC/PDH) were determined from glutamate and glutamine labeling. The following results were obtained: (i) amino-acid enrichment patterns implied metabolic compartmentation and occurrence of the glutamate-glutamine cycle; (ii) kinetics of aspartate, GABA, and glutamate labeling from [1-C-13] glucose and of glutamine labeling from [2-C-13] acetate indicated a twofold higher metabolic activity in awake than in anesthetized rat brain; (iii) evaluation of the contributions of the astrocytic and neuronal metabolisms to glutamine synthesis in both groups of rats indicated a coupling between neuronal tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, glutamate-glutamine cycle and glial TCA cycle; and (iv) analyzing the extrapolations back to time zero and the steady-state values of PC/PDH indicated a close coupling between PC activity and both astrocytic and neuronal TCA cycles. All these results suggest a cooperative-like behavior of astrocytic and neuronal metabolisms to fulfill the anabolic and energy needs linked to brain activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available