Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 803-813Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.04.112
Keywords
Nanofluids; Laminar; Vertical tube; DPM; Mixture model; CFD
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Nanofluids consist of liquid and solid (nanoparticles). Therefore, they can be classified as two-component flow, which brings up different approaches for simulation purposes. In this study, heat transfer and hydrodynamic features of nanoparticles in a laminar nanofluid flow in a vertical tube were investigated numerically through the Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches. Discrete Phase Model (DPM) in the Lagrangian approach simulates the motion of particles through base flow with force balance equation. Therefore, there is no need for empirical correlations, at least for the thermophysical properties, which they are not universal and change for different fluids and/or nanoparticles. Although general empirical or analytical correlations are needed for some interactions between solid and liquid such as T'hermophoresis, Brownian and clustering effects, they were not extensive and could be employed in most of the cases. Mixture model in the Eulerian approach provides more reliable results, but it highly depends on the accuracy of the correlations for the thermophysical properties of the nanofluid. In the present study, three common types of nanofluids consisting of Alumina. Zirconia and Silica nanoparticles (up to 2.76% of volume fraction) were studied and the results were compared with experimental works. Numerical simulations indicated that the findings were in good agreement with the measured heat transfer coefficient for DPM. Consequently, DPM could be highly recommended for simulation studies due to the strength and simplicity. It was also observed that the effects of nanoparticles in each computational cell needed to be distributed to the other neighbourhood cells. Pressure loss results predicted by DPM were found to be reliable for volume fraction less than 3%, notwithstanding the types of nanoparticles or diameter. DPM velocity profiles showed that the slip velocity between nanoparticles and base flow was not negligible. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available