4.3 Article

Alpha Male Chimpanzee Grooming Patterns: Implications for Dominance Style

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 136-144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20632

Keywords

chimpanzee; alpha male; grooming; dominance style; body mass

Categories

Funding

  1. Jane Goodall Institute
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. The Windibrow Foundation [IIS-0431141, BCS-0452315]
  4. The University of Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In social primates, individuals use various tactics to compete for dominance rank. Grooming, displays and contact aggression are common components of a male chimpanzee's dominance repertoire. The optimal combination of these behaviors is likely to differ among males with individuals exhibiting a dominance style that reflects their tendency to use cooperative and/or agonistic dominance tactics. Here, we examine the grooming behavior of three alpha male chimpanzees at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. We found that (1) these males differed significantly in their tendency to groom with other males; (2) each male's grooming patterns remained consistent before, during and after his tenure as alpha, and (3) the three males tended to groom with high- middle- and low-ranking partners equally. We suggest that body mass may be one possible determinant of differences in grooming behavior. The largest male exhibited the lowest overall grooming rates, whereas the smallest male spent the most time grooming others. This is probably because large males are more effective at physically intimidating subordinates. To achieve alpha status, a small male may need to compensate for reduced size by investing more time and energy in grooming, thereby ensuring coalitionary support from others. Rates of contact aggression and charging displays conformed to this prediction, suggesting that each male exhibited a different dominance style. Am. J. Primatol. 71:136-144, 2009. (C) 2008 Wilev-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available