4.6 Article

Inhibitory Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide on Ozone-Induced Airway Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0415OC

Keywords

hydrogen sulfide; ozone; airway inflammation; oxidative stress; bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100024]
  2. Shanghai Health Bureau [2011274]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure to ozone has been associated with airway inflammation, oxidative stress, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The goal of this study was to examine whether these adverse effects of ozone could be prevented or reversed by hydrogen sulfide (H2S) as a reducing agent. The H2S donor sodium (NaHS) (2 mg/kg) or vehicle (PBS) was intraperitoneally injected into mice 1 hour before and after 3-hour ozone (2.5 ppm) or air exposure, and the mice were studied 24 hours later. Preventive and therapeutic treatment with NaHS reduced the ozone-induced increases in the total cells, including neutrophils and macrophages; this treatment also reduced levels of cytokines, including TN-alpha, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1, IL-6, and IL-1 beta levels in bronchial alveolar lavage fluid; inhibited bronchial hyperresponsiveness; and attenuated ozone-induced increases in total malondialdehyde in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and decreases in the ratio of reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione in the lung. Ozone exposure led to decreases in the H2S production rate and in mRNA and protein levels of cystathionine-beta-synthetase and cystathionine-gamma-lyase in the lung. These effects were prevented and reversed by NaHS treatment. Furthermore, NaHS prevented and reversed the phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and heat shock protein 27. H2S may have preventive and therapeutic value in the treatment of airway diseases that have an oxidative stress basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available