Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 298-303Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.027
Keywords
-
Funding
- University of Queensland Major Equipment and Infrastructure grant
- United Arab Emirates Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research Scholarship
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship [389500]
- NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [511001]
- NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [1003960]
- NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [569861]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Sitting time is a prevalent health risk among office-based workers. Purpose: To examine, using a pilot study, the efficacy of an intervention to reduce office workers' sitting time. Design: Quasi-experimental design with intervention-group participants recruited from a single workplace that was physically separate from the workplaces of comparison-group participants. Setting/participants: Office workers (Intervention, n = 18; Comparison, n = 14) aged 20-65 years from Brisbane, Australia; data were collected and analyzed in 2011. Intervention: Installation of a commercially available sit-stand workstation. Main outcome measures: Changes from baseline at 1-week and 3-month follow-up in time spent sitting, standing, and stepping at the workplace and during all waking time (activPAL3 activity monitor, 7-day observation). Fasting total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose levels were assessed at baseline and 3 months (Cholestech LDX Analyzer). Acceptability was assessed with a 5-point response scale (eight items). Results: The intervention group (relative to the comparison group) reduced sitting time at 1-week follow-up by 143 minutes/day at the workplace (95% CI = -184, -102) and 97 minutes/day during all waking time (95% CI = -144, -50). These effects were maintained at 3 months (-137 minutes/day and -78 minutes/day, respectively). Sitting was almost exclusively replaced by standing, with minimal changes to stepping time. Relative to the comparison group, the intervention group increased HDL cholesterol by an average of 0.26 mmol/L (95% CI = 0.10, 0.42). Other biomarker differences were not significant. There was strong acceptability and preference for using the workstations, though some design limitations were noted. Conclusions: This trial is the first with objective measurement and a comparison group to demonstrate that the introduction of a sit-stand workstation can substantially reduce office workers' sitting time both at the workplace and overall throughout the week. (Am J Prev Med 2012;43(3):298-303) (c) 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available