Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages E21-E29Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.014
Keywords
-
Funding
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study (MIDAS) [1U54GM088491-0109]
- National Library of Medicine [5R01LM009132-02]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [5P01TP000304-02]
- Medimmune
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: In December 2009, when the H1N1 influenza pandemic appeared to be subsiding, public health officials and unvaccinated individuals faced the question of whether continued H1N1 immunization was still worthwhile. Purpose: To delineate what combinations of possible mechanisms could generate a third pandemic wave and then explore whether vaccinating the population at different rates and times would mitigate the wave. Methods: As part of ongoing work with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the USDHHS during the H1N1 influenza pandemic, the University of Pittsburgh Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study team employed an agent-based computer simulation model of the Washington DC metropolitan region to delineate what mechanisms could generate a third pandemic wave and explored whether vaccinating the population at different rates and times would mitigate the wave. This model included explicit representations of the region's individuals, school systems, workplaces/commutes, households, and communities. Results: Three mechanisms were identified that could cause a third pandemic wave; substantially increased viral transmissibility from seasonal forcing (changing influenza transmission with changing environmental conditions, i.e., seasons) and progressive viral adaptation; an immune escape variant; and changes in social mixing from holiday school closures. Implementing vaccination for these mechanisms, even during the down-slope of the fall epidemic wave, significantly mitigated the third wave. Scenarios showed the gains from initiating vaccination earlier, increasing the speed of vaccination, and prioritizing population subgroups based on Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations. Conclusions: Additional waves in an epidemic can be mitigated by vaccination even when an epidemic appears to be waning. (Am J Prev Med 2010;39(5):e21-e29) (C) 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available