4.6 Article

Using hand-held computer technologies to improve dietary intake

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 514-518

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.034

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL007034] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [5T32H107034] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Portable hand-held information technology offers much promise not only in assessing dietary intake in the real world, but also in providing dietary feedback to individuals. However, stringent research designs have not been employed to examine whether it can be effective in modifying dietary behaviors. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy of a hand-held computer (i.e., personal digital assistant [PDA]) for increasing vegetable and whole-grain intake over 8 weeks in mid-life and older adults, using a randomized study design. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy adults aged 50 were randomized and completed the 8-week study. Intervention participants received an instructional session and a PDA programmed to monitor their vegetable and whole-grain intake levels twice per day and to provide daily individualized feedback, goal-setting, and support. Controls received standard, age-appropriate, written nutritional education materials. Dietary intake was assessed via the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire at baseline and 8 weeks. Results: Relative to controls, intervention participants reported significantly greater increases in vegetable servings (1.5-2.5 servings/day; p=0.02), as well as a trend toward greater intake of dietary fiber from grains (3.7-4.5 servings/day; p=0.10). Conclusions: This study's findings provide preliminary evidence that using portable hand-held technology to provide daily individualized feedback OD dietary behavior in the real world can increase the dietary intake of healthy food groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available