4.8 Article

The tumor suppressor p53 associates with gene coding regions and co-traverses with elongating RNA polymerase II in an in vivo model

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages 2661-2672

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210935

Keywords

p53; transcription elongation; RNA polymerase II; chromatin; acidic activator; yeast genetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sequence-specific transcriptional regulators function by stably binding cognate DNA sequences followed by recruitment of both general and specialized factors to target gene promoters. The tumor suppressor p53 mediates its antioncogenic effect on cells by functioning as a sequence specific regulator. p53 employs a secondary mechanism to suppress tumor formation by permeabilizing the outer mitochondrial membrane, thereby releasing pro-apoptotic factors. Here, we report a potential third biological function of p53: as a transcriptional elongation factor. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that human p53 robustly associates with RNA polymerase II (Pol II), but neither Pol I- nor Pol III-transcribed regions in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. p53's association with open reading frames is mediated by its physical interaction with elongating Pol II, with which p53 travels in vivo and co-immunoprecipitates in vitro. When similarly expressed, the potent acidic activator VP16 cannot be crosslinked to Pol II coding regions. p53 levels comparable to those found in induced mammalian cells confer synthetic sickness or lethality in combination with deletions in genes encoding transcription elongation factors; p53 likewise confers hypersensitivity to the anti-elongation drug 6-azauracil. Collectively, our results indicate that p53 can physically interact with the transcription elongation complex and influence transcription elongation, and open up new avenues of investigation in mammalian cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available