4.3 Article

Sex differences in the modulation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow during static handgrip exercise in healthy young humans

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00562.2010

Keywords

cold pressor test; muscle sympathetic nerve activity; metaboreflex

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-075283]
  2. National Space Biomedical Research Institute [CA00701]
  3. Clinical and Translational Research Center (formerly, the General Clinical Research Center) [RR-00633]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23689014] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Jarvis SS, VanGundy TB, Galbreath MM, Shibata S, Okazaki K, Reelick MF, Levine BD, Fu Q. Sex differences in the modulation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow during static hand-grip exercise in healthy young humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301: R193-R200, 2011. First published April 20, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00562.2010.-Sex differences in sympathetic neural control during static exercise in humans are few and the findings are inconsistent. We hypothesized women would have an attenuated vasomotor sympathetic response to static exercise, which would be further reduced during the high sex hormone [midluteal (ML)] vs. the low hormone phase [early follicular (EF)]. We measured heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in 11 women and 10 men during a cold pressor test (CPT) and static handgrip to fatigue with 2 min of postexercise circulatory arrest (PECA). HR increased during handgrip, reached its peak at fatigue, and was comparable between sexes. BP increased during handgrip and PECA where men had larger increases from baseline. Mean +/- SD MSNA burst frequency (BF) during handgrip and PECA was lower in women (EF, P < 0.05), as was Delta MSNA-BF smaller (main effect, both P < 0.01). Delta Total activity was higher in men at fatigue (EF: 632 +/- 418 vs. ML: 598 +/- 342 vs. men: 1,025 +/- 416 a.u./min, P < 0.001 for EF and ML vs. men) and during PECA (EF: 354 +/- 321 vs. ML: 341 +/- 199 vs. men: 599 +/- 327 a.u./min, P < 0.05 for EF and ML vs. men). During CPT, HR and MSNA responses were similar between sexes and hormone phases, confirming that central integration and the sympathetic efferent pathway was comparable between the sexes and across hormone phases. Women demonstrated a blunted metaboreflex, unaffected by sex hormones, which may be due to differences in muscle mass or fiber type and, therefore, metabolic stimulation of group IV afferents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available