4.5 Article

Stiffness and heterogeneity of the pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx measured by atomic force microscopy

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00342.2010

Keywords

atomic force microscopy; bovine lung microvascular endothelial cell; heparan sulfate; hyaluronan

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5RO1HL085255]
  2. University of Utah

Ask authors/readers for more resources

O'Callaghan R, Job KM, Dull RO, Hlady V. Stiffness and heterogeneity of the pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx measured by atomic force microscopy. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 301: L353-L360, 2011. First published June 24, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajplung.00342.2010.-The mechanical properties of endothelial glycocalyx were studied using atomic force microscopy with a silica bead (diameter similar to 18 mu m) serving as an indenter. Even at indentations of several hundred nanometers, the bead exerted very low compressive pressures on the bovine lung microvascular endothelial cell (BLMVEC) glycocalyx and allowed for an averaging of stiffness in the bead-cell contact area. The elastic modulus of BLMVEC glycocalyx was determined as a pointwise function of the indentation depth before and after enzymatic degradation of specific glycocalyx components. The modulus-indentation depth profiles showed the cells becoming progressively stiffer with increased indentation. Three different enzymes were used: heparinases III and I and hyaluronidase. The main effects of heparinase III and hyaluronidase enzymes were that the elastic modulus in the cell junction regions increased more rapidly with the indentation than in BLMVEC controls, and that the effective thickness of glycocalyx was reduced. Cytochalasin D abolished the modulus increase with the indentation. The confocal profiling of heparan sulfate and hyaluronan with atomic force microscopy indentation data demonstrated marked heterogeneity of the glycocalyx composition between cell junctions and nuclear regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available