4.7 Article

The mass-metallicity relation of interacting galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 386, Issue 1, Pages L82-L86

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00466.x

Keywords

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : interactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the mass-metallicity relation of galaxies in pairs and in isolation taken from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey- Data Release 4 ( SDSS- DR4) using the stellar masses and oxygen abundances derived by Tremonti et al. Close galaxy pairs, defined by projected separation r(p) < 25 kpc h(-1) and radial velocity Delta V < 350 km s(-1), are morphologically classified according to the strength of the interaction signs. We find that only for pairs showing signs of strong interactions, the mass-metallicity relation differs significantly from that of galaxies in isolation. In such pairs, the mean gas-phase oxygen abundances of galaxies with low stellar masses (M-* less than or similar to 10(9)M(circle dot) h(-1)) exhibit an excess of 0.2 dex. Conversely, at larger masses ( M-*greater than or similar to 10(10)M(circle dot) h(-1)) galaxies have a systematically lower metallicity, although with a smaller difference (-0.05 dex). Similar trends are obtained if g-band magnitudes are used instead of stellar masses. In minor interactions, we find that the less massive member is systematically enriched, while a galaxy in interaction with a comparable stellar mass companion shows a metallicity decrement with respect to galaxies in isolation. We argue that metal-rich starbursts triggered by a more massive component, and inflows of low-metallicity gas induced by comparable or less massive companion galaxies, provide a natural scenario to explain our findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available