4.6 Article

Sequential muscle biopsies during a 6-h tracer infusion do not affect human mixed muscle protein synthesis and muscle phenylalanine kinetics

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00671.2007

Keywords

stable isotopes; muscle protein turnover; tracer kinetics; muscle biopsies

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 AG-024832, R01 AG-18311, R01 AR-049877, S10 RR-16650, M01 RR-00073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotope tracer experiments of human muscle amino acid and protein kinetics often involve a sequential design, with the same subject studied at baseline and during an intervention. However, prolonged fasting and sequential muscle biopsies from the same area could theoretically affect muscle protein metabolism. The purpose of this study was to determine if sequential muscle biopsies and extended fasting significantly affect parameters of muscle protein and amino acid kinetics in six human subjects. After a 12-h overnight fast, a primed continuous infusion of L-[ring-2H5] phenylalanine was started. After 120 min, we took the first of a series of five hourly muscle biopsies from the same vastus lateralis to measure mixed muscle protein fractional synthetic rate. Furthermore, between 150-180, 210-240, and 330-360 min, we measured leg phenylalanine kinetics using the two-pool and the three-pool arteriovenous balance models. Tracer enrichments were at steady state, and muscle protein FSR and phenylalanine kinetics did not change throughout the experiment (P = not significant). We conclude that a 6-h tracer infusion during extended fasting (up to 18 h) with five sequential muscle biopsies from the same muscle do not affect basal mixed muscle protein synthesis and muscle phenylalanine kinetics in human subjects. Thus, when using a sequential study design over this period of time, it is unnecessary to include a saline only control group to account for these variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available