4.6 Article

Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 292-311

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014

Keywords

CCS; Risk assessment; Risk management; Geologic CO2 storage; Risk communication; Quantitative risk assessment

Funding

  1. US DOE's National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP) project
  2. US DOE's Fossil Energy Program Office through its CO2 Sequestration RD Program
  3. National Energy Technology Laboratory
  4. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy by Los Alamos National Laboratory [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K035967/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H01392X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/K035967/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. NERC [NE/H01392X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper gives an overview of the advances made in the field of risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage (GCS), since the publication of the IPCC Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage in 2005. Development and operation of a wide range of demonstration projects coupled with development of new regulations for safe injection and storage of CO2 have led to development and deployment of a range of risk assessment approaches. New methods and tools have been developed for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment. These methods have been integrated effectively with monitoring and mitigation techniques and deployed in the field for small-scale field tests as well as large-scale commercial projects. An important development has been improved definition of risks, which can be broadly classed as site performance risks, long-term containment risks, public perception risks and market risks. Considerable experience has now been gained on understanding and managing site performance risks. Targeted research on containment risks and induced seismicity risks has led to improved understanding of parameters and processes influencing these risks as well as identifying key uncertainties that need to be targeted. Finally, significant progress has been made to effectively integrate communication strategies with risk management approaches to increase stakeholder confidence in effectiveness of deployed risk management approaches to manage risks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available