4.3 Article

Brief communication: Short- and long-term in vivo human buccal-dental microwear turnover

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 148, Issue 3, Pages 467-472

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22054

Keywords

teeth; buccal surface; SEM; dental microwear; turnover

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Espana (MEC) [Spanish CGL2010-15340, CGL2011-22999]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana, Espana (GV) [GV04B-521]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Buccaldental microwear depends on the abrasive content of chewed foodstuffs and can reveal long-term dietary trends in human populations. However, in vivo experimental analyses of buccal microwear formation processes are scarce. Here, we report the effects of an abrasive diet on microwear rates in two adult volunteers at intervals of 8 days over a period of 1 month and document long-term turnover over 5 consecutive years in the same subjects under an ad libitum Mediterranean diet. Buccal microwear was analyzed on mandibular first molars using high-resolution replicas and scanning electron microscopy. Microwear turnover was assessed by recording the scratches lost and gained at each time point. Our results indicate that scratch formation on enamel surfaces increased with a highly abrasive diet compared to both pre-test and post-test ad libitum dietary controls. In the long-term analysis, scratch turnover was higher than expected, but no significant long-term trends in microwear density or length were observed, because microwear formation was compensated by scratch disappearance. Our results confirm that buccal microwear patterns on mandibular molars show a dynamic formation process directly related to the chewing of abrasive particles along with ingested food. In addition, the observed long-term stability of buccal microwear patterns makes them a reliable indicator of overall dietary habits. Am J Phys Anthropol 148:467472, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available