4.3 Article

Brief Communication: DNA From Early Holocene American Dog

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 4, Pages 653-657

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21526

Keywords

canine domestication; peopling of America; Paleoamerican; Paleoindian; aDNA

Funding

  1. University of Oklahoma's Molecular Anthropology Laboratories, National Science Foundation [NSF 0845314]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NHGRI/NIH R01 HG005172-01]
  3. College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
  4. Department of Anthropology
  5. Climate Change Institute at the University of Maine
  6. Getty Archaeological Studies Fund
  7. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  8. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0845314] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the oldest genetically identified dog in the Americas, directly dated to 9,260 170 Cal. B.P. The DNA was extracted from an occipital condyle imbedded in a human paleofecal sample from Hinds Cave in southwest Texas. A 368 base pair fragment of the mitochondrial genome control region was sequenced. These data were analyzed with comparable data, which included other ancient dogs and extant dogs, wolves and coyotes from around the world. Compiled with published data, our results characterize ancient American dogs within clades rooted by Eurasian wolves. In the Americas, these data provide no evidence of local interbreeding with wolves. This is a departure from the genetic pattern in other areas of the world where interbreeding with local wolf populations is apparent. Our discovery of domestic dog bone in a human paleofecal sample provides the earliest direct evidence for human consumption of dogs in the New World. These data support the hypothesis that dogs were a food source for early Paleoamericans. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:653-657, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available