4.3 Article

Stable Isotope Evidence for the Consumption of Millet and Other Plants in Bronze Age Italy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 146-153

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20955

Keywords

prehistoric diet; stable isotopes; millet; Bronze Age; Italy

Funding

  1. Italian MIUR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis was carried out on human and animal bones from four inland Early and Middle Bronze Age sites in Northern and Southern Italy. The main aims of the investigation were to explore the contribution of plant foods to the human diet and to examine any dietary differences between and within each of the sites. At two of the sites in Northern Italy, human and animal bones were significantly enriched in C-13. This finding was attributed to the consumption of domestic millets (Panicum miliaceum and/or Setaria italica), which are C-4 pathway plants. Conversely, individuals from the two Bronze Age sites in Southern Italy were significantly depleted in C-13 compared to those from the north. Here, millet was absent from the diet, and protein from C-3 plants made a much greater dietary contribution than animal protein. This finding highlights the importance of cereal cultivation, most likely of wheat and barley, in the south of Italy during the Bronze Age. Overall, our results support the idea that the widespread cultivation of millet first occurred in Northern Italy, following its introduction from across the Alps in Central Europe. Finally, we found no significant differences in the stable isotope values between individuals at each site, when grouped by their sex or presence of grave goods. This leads to the conclusion that any status difference that may have existed is not reflected in the long-term dietary record, or at least not as measurable by stable isotope analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:146-153, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available