4.3 Article

Near Eastern Neolithic Genetic Input in a Small Oasis of the Egyptian Western Desert

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages 336-346

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21078

Keywords

Egyptian Western Desert; complete mtDNA sequences; T haplogroup; Y-chromosome; Neolithic

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GA206/08/1587]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PTDC/ANT/66275/2006]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [0048620802]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/ANT/66275/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Egyptian Western Desert lies on an important geographic intersection between Africa and Asia. Genetic diversity of this region has been shaped, in part, by climatic changes in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene epochs marked by oscillating humid and and periods. We present here a whole genome analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and high-resolution molecular analysis of nonrecombining Y-chromosomal (NRY) gene pools of a demographically small but autochthonous population from the Egyptian Western Desert oasis el-Hayez. Notwithstanding signs of expected genetic drift, we still found clear genetic evidence of a strong Near Eastern input that can be dated into the Neolithic. This is revealed by high frequencies and high internal variability of several mtDNA lineages from haplogroup T. The whole genome sequencing strategy and molecular dating allowed us to detect the accumulation of local mtDNA diversity to 5,138 +/- 3,633 YBP. Similarly, the Y-chromosome gene pool reveals high frequencies of the Near Eastern J1 and the North African E1b1b1b lineages, both generally known to have expanded within North Africa during the Neolithic. These results provide another piece of evidence of the relatively young population history of North Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol 140:336-346, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available