4.2 Article

Staphylococcus aureus, including Community-Acquired Methicillin-resistant S. aureus, in a Level III NICU: 2001 to 2008

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 401-408

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304819

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA; preterm; NICU

Funding

  1. Case Western Reserve University/Cleveland Clinic CTSA from The National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [UL1 RR024989]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To determine epidemiology and clinical characteristics of infants with methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Study Design All NICU admissions (2001 to 2008) with any positive S. aureus culture were included as cases. Cases were further characterized as either colonized or infected with invasive disease. Results Four thousand three hundred four infants were admitted; 273 (6.3%) had at least one culture positive for S. aureus, including 198 with MSSA and 75 with MRSA. Invasive disease occurred in 23.2% of MSSA cases versus 29.3% MRSA (p = 0.298). Between the study periods 2001 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2008, the incidence of all MSSA cultures (colonization and invasive disease) decreased from 53.6 to 38.9/1000 admissions (p = 0.044), and that of MRSA increased from 13.7 to 24.77/1000 admissions (p = 0.010). The incidence of invasive MSSA (p = 0.49) and MRSA (p = 0.38) disease between the two periods remained similar. Infants with invasive MRSA versus MSSA had a longer duration of positive cultures (55 versus 19 days, p = 0.009). None of five available isolates collected prior to 2006 was characterized as USA300, but 11/21 isolates collected subsequently were USA300 (p = 0.053). Conclusion The incidence of MRSA (colonization and infection) nearly doubled during the study period coinciding with emergence of community-acquired MRSA USA300.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available