Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 705-710Publisher
THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253102
Keywords
Gestational diabetes; evidence-based practice; electronic medical record; type 2 diabetes
Categories
Funding
- Partners IS Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Women with gestational diabetes (GDM) are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but many do not receive recommended follow-up. We sought to identify barriers to follow-up screening. We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) and obstetric and gynecology care providers (OBCPs) in a large health system. We also assessed documentation of GDM history in the health care system's electronic medical record. Four hundred seventy-eight clinicians were surveyed, among whom 207 responded. Most participants (81.1%) gave an accurate estimate of risk of progression to T2DM. PCPs were less likely than OBCPs to ask patients about history of GDM (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 0.90), but they were far more likely to indicate that they order glucose screening for women with a known history (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.01 to 9.26). Providers identified poor communication between OBCPs and PCPs as a major barrier to screening. Fewer than half (45.8%) of 450 women with GDM by glucose tolerance test criteria had that history documented on their electronic problem list. Clinicians are aware that women with GDM are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but they do not routinely assess and screen patients, and communication between OBCPs and PCPs can be improved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available