4.6 Article

Restriction of Food Intake Prevents Postinfarction Heart Failure by Enhancing Autophagy in the Surviving Cardiomyocytes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 5, Pages 1384-1394

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.01.011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan
  2. Japanese Medical Association
  3. Gifu University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effect of restriction of food intake, a potent inducer of autophagy, on postinfarction cardiac remodeling and dysfunction. Myocardial infarction was induced in mice by left coronary artery ligation. At 1 week after infarction, mice were randomly divided into four groups: the control group was fed ad libitum (1000); the food restriction (FR) groups were fed 80%, 60%, or 40% of the mean amount of food consumed by the control mice. After 2 weeks on the respective diets, left ventricular dilatation and hypofunction were apparent in the control group, but both parameters were significantly mitigated in the FR groups, with the 60% FR group showing the strongest therapeutic effect. Cardiomyocyte autophagy was strongly activated in the FR groups, as indicated by up-regulation of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3-II, autophagosome formation, and myocardial ATP content. Chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor, completely canceled the therapeutic effect of FR. This negative effect was associated with reduced activation of AMP-activated protein kinase and of ULK1 (a homolog of yeast Atg1), both of which were enhanced in hearts from the FR group. In vitro, the AMP-activated protein kinase inhibitor compound C suppressed glucose depletion induced autophagy in cardiomyocytes, but did not influence activity of chloroquine. Our findings imply that a dietary protocol with FR could be a preventive strategy against postinfarction heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available