4.6 Article

Type I to Type II Ovarian Carcinoma Progression: Mutant Trp53 or Pik3ca Confers a More Aggressive Tumor Phenotype in a Mouse Model of Ovarian Cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 4, Pages 1391-1399

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.12.031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [RO1CA94172, RO1CA135554]
  2. Department of Defense grant [W81XWH-10-2-0013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dualistic pathway model of ovarian carcinoma (OvCA) pathogenesis has been proposed: type I OvCAs are low grade, genetically stable, and relatively more indolent than type II OvCAs, most of which are high-grade serous carcinomas. Endometrioid OvCA (EOC) is a prototypical type I tumor, often harboring mutations that affect the Wnt and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathways. Molecular and histopathologic analyses indicate type I and II OvCAs share overlapping features, and a subset of E0Cs may undergo type I -> type II progression accompanied by acquisition of somatic TP53 or PIK3CA mutations. We used a murine model of EOC initiated by conditional inactivation of the Apc and Pten tumor suppressor genes to investigate mutant Trp53 or Pik3ca alleles as key drivers of type -> I type II OvCA progression. In the mouse EOC model, the presence of somatic Trp53 or Pik3ca mutations resulted in shortened survival and more widespread metastasis. Activation of mutant Pik3ca alone had no demonstrable effect on the ovarian surface epithelium but resulted in papillary hyperplasia when coupled with Pten inactivation. Our findings indicate that the adverse prognosis associated with TP53 and PIK3CA mutations in human cancers can be functionally replicated in mouse models of type I -> type II OvCA progression. Moreover, the models should represent a robust platform for assessment of the contributions of Trp53 or Pik3ca defects in the response of E0Cs to conventional and targeted drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available