4.6 Article

Sec62 Bridges the Gap from 3q Amplification to Molecular Cell Biology in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 2, Pages 473-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.039

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. HOMFOR
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR967]
  3. Saarland University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The molecular carcinogenesis of lung cancer has yet to be clearly elucidated. We investigated the possible oncogenic function of SEC62 in lung cancer, which was predicted based on our previous findings that lung and thyroid cancer tissue samples exhibited increased Sec62 protein levels. The SEC62 gene locus is at 3q26.2, and 3q amplification is reportedly the most common genomic alteration in non-small cell lung cancer. We analyzed SEC62 inRNA and protein levels in tissue samples from lung cancer patients by real-time quantitative PCR, Western blot, and IHC and found significantly increased SEC62 inRNA and protein levels in tumors compared with tumor-free tissue samples from the same patients. Correlation analyses revealed significantly higher Sec62 levels in tumors with lymph node metastases compared with non-metastatic tumors, as well as in poorly compared with moderately differentiated tumors. On the basis of these promising results, we examined the role of Sec62 in cancer cell biology in vitro. Cell migration assays with lung and thyroid cancer cells showed distinct stimulation of migration in SEC62-overexpressing cells and inhibition of migration in Sec62-depleted cells. Moreover, we found that SEC62 silencing sensitized the cells to thapsigargin-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Thus, our results indicate that SEC62 represents a potential candidate oncogene in the amplified 3q region in cases of non-small cell lung cancer and harbors various functions in cancer cell biology. (Am J Pathol 2012, 180:473-483; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.039)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available