4.6 Article

Podocalyxin EBP50 Ezrin Molecular Complex Enhances the Metastatic Potential of Renal Cell Carcinoma Through Recruiting Rac1 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor ARHGEF7

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 6, Pages 3050-3061

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090539

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC94-3114-P002-002-Y[3], NSC95-2320-B002-048, NSC97-3112-B-002-041]
  2. National Taiwan University Hospital [NTUH-96S617, NTUH-97A08-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Podocalyxin was initially identified in glomerular podocytes to critically maintain the structural and functional integrity of the glomerular ultrafiltrative apparatus. Lately, it has emerged as a malignant marker in tumors arising from a variety of tissue origins. By immunohistochemistry, we identified that 9.6% of renal cell carcinoma patients overexpress this protein. This subset of patients had significantly shorter disease-specific and overall survivals, and, importantly, we established podocalyxin overexpression as an independent prognostic factor for latent distant metastasis with multivariate analysis. Podocalyxin down-regulation by small interfering RNA led to defective migration in model renal tubular cells, which was corrected by re-expression of podocalyxin. The activity of the small GTPase Rac1, a well-characterized modulator of cell migration, was diminished by podocalyxin knock-down. Conversely, podocalyxin overexpression in human embryonic kidney cells up-regulated Rac1 activity, which depended on a complex formed by podocalyxin, ERM-binding phosphoprotein 50, ezrin, and ARHGEF7, a Rac1 activator. Therefore, podocalyxin can serve as a biomarker to identify renal cell carcinoma patients with higher metastatic potential for more aggressive intervention at earlier clinical stages. (Am J Pathol 2010, 176:3050-3061; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090539)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available