4.6 Article

Antibody-Directed Myostatin Inhibition Improves Diaphragm Pathology in Young but not Adult Dystrophic mdx Mice

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 5, Pages 2425-2434

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090932

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer Global Research and Development
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [520034]
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by progressive skeletal muscle wasting and weakness, leading to premature death from respiratory and/or cardiac failure. A clinically relevant question is whether myostatin inhibition can improve function of the diaphragm, which exhibits a severe and progressive pathology comparable with that in DMD. We hypothesized that antibody-directed myostatin inhibition would improve the pathophysiology of diaphragm muscle strips from young mdx mice (when the pathology is mild) and adult mdx mice (when the pathology is quite marked). Five weeks treatment with a mouse chimera of anti-human myostatin antibody (PF-354, 10 mg/kg/week) increased muscle mass (P < 0.05) and increased diaphragm median fiber cross-sectional area (CSA, P < 0.05) in young C57BL/10 and mdx mice, compared with saline-treated controls. PF-354 had no effect on specific force (sP(o), maximum force normalized to muscle CSA) of diaphragm muscle strips from young C57BL/10 mice, but increased sP(o) by 84% (P < 0.05) in young mdx mice. In contrast, 8 weeks of PF-354 treatment did not improve muscle mass, median fiber CSA, collagen infiltration, or sP(o) of diaphragm muscle strips from adult mdx mice. PF-354 antibody-directed myostatin inhibition completely restored the functional capacity of diaphragm strips to control levels when treatment was initiated early, but not in the later stages of disease progression, suggesting that such therapies may only have a limited window of efficacy for DMD and related conditions. (Am J Pathol 2010, 176:2425-2434; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090932)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available