4.6 Article

Evaluation of Bone Marrow- and Brain-Derived Neural Stem Cells in Therapy of Central Nervous System Autoimmunity

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 4, Pages 1989-2001

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091203

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, NIH
  2. Groff Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adult subventricular zone (SVZ)-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) have therapeutic effects in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of multiple sclerosis. However, SVZ precursor cells as a source of NSCs are not readily accessible for clinical application. In the present study, we demonstrate that NSCs derived from bone marrow (BM) cells exhibit comparable morphological properties as those derived from SVZ cells and possess a similar ability to differentiate into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, both types of NSCs suppressed chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis to a comparable extent on transplantation. Mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of NSCs include immunomodulation in the periphery and the central nervous system (CNS), neuron/oligodendrocyte repopulation by transplanted cells, and enhanced endogenous remyelination and axonal recovery. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the trans-differentiation of transplanted BM-NSCs into neural cells in the CNS, while no fusion of these cells with host neural cells was detected. This is the first study that directly compares SVZ- versus BM-NSCs with regard to in vivo neural differentiation and anti-inflammatory and therapeutic effects on CNS inflammatory demyelination. Their virtually identical therapeutic potential, greater accessibility, and autologous properties make BM-NSCs a novel and highly applicable substitute for SVZ-NSCs in cell-based multiple sclerosis therapies. (Am J Pathol 2010, 177:1989-2001; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091203)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available