4.6 Article

The Urokinase Receptor Promotes Cancer Metastasis Independently of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator in Mice

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 1, Pages 190-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081053

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA-94900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The urokinase receptor (uPAR) promotes metastasis of human malignancies; however, its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood. Established models focus on the ability of uPAR to bind urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and promote protease activation in the tumor cell microenvironment; however, uPAR also regulates cell signaling and migration by both uPA-dependent and -independent mechanisms in vitro. The significance of uPAR as a cell-signaling receptor in vivo remains unclear. in this study, we expressed either human or mouse uPAR in human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells. We selected HEK-293 cells because, unlike most cancer cells, they do not express uPA or uPAR endogenously. Both mouse and human uPAR increased cell adhesion and migration on vitronectin. Rac1 was activated and responsible for the increase in cell migration. HEK-293 cells that did not express uPAR formed palpable tumors in severe combined immunodeficient mice; however, metastases were exceedingly rare. The xenografts contained abundant mouse uPA, produced by infiltrating mouse cells, but no human uPA. Mouse uPA bound only to mouse uPAR and not human uPAR and, thus, could not interact with human uPAR-expressing HEK-293 cells in xenografts. Nevertheless, both mouse and human uPAR significantly increased HEK-293 cell metastasis into the lungs. The activity of human uPAR suggests that uPAR may promote cancer metastasis independent of uPA. Candidate mechanisms include its effects on adhesion, migration, and Rac1 activation. (Am J Pathol 2009, 175:190-200; DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081053)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available