4.6 Article

Caveolin-1-/- Null Mammary Stromal Fibroblasts Share Characteristics with Human Breast Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 3, Pages 746-761

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080658

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA098779, R01-CA-80250, P30-CA-56036, R01-CA-120876, R01-CA-70896, R01 CA120876, R01 CA070896, R01-CA-098779, R01 CA075503, R01-CA-86072, P30 CA056036, R01-CA-107382, R01 CA107382, R01 CA086072, R01 CA080250, T32 CA117846, R01-CA-75503] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR055660, R01 AR055660-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, we reported that human breast cancer-associated fibroblasts show functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor and down-regulation of caveolin-1 (Cav-1) protein expression. However, it remains unknown whether loss of Cav-1 is sufficient to confer functional RB inactivation in mammary fibroblasts. To establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship, mammary stromal fibroblasts (MSFs) were prepared from Cav-1(-/-) null mice and subjected to phenotypic analysis. Here, we provide evidence that Cav-1(-/-) MSFs share many characteristics with human cancer-associated fibroblasts. The Cav-1(-/-) MSF transcriptome significantly overlaps with human cancer-associated fibroblasts; both show a nearly identical profile of RB/E2F-regulated genes that are up-regulated, which is consistent with RB inactivation. This Cav-1(-/-)MSF gene signature is predictive of poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Consistent with these findings, Cav-1(-/-) MSFs show RB hyperphosphorylation and the up-regulation of estrogen receptor co-activator genes. We also evaluated the paracrine effects of conditioned media prepared from Cav-1(-/-) MSFs on wild-type mammary epithelia. Our

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available