4.6 Review

Sex differences in autoimmune disease from a pathological perspective

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 3, Pages 600-609

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071008

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL087033, R01 HL087033-01, R01 HL067290, R01 HL67290] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES03819, P30 ES003819] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autoimmune diseases affect similar to 8% of the population, 78% of whom are women. The reason for the high prevalence in women is unclear. Women are known to respond to infection, vaccination, and trauma with increased antibody production and a more T helper (Th)2-predominant immune response, whereas a Th1 response and inflammation are usually more severe in men. This review discusses the distribution of antoimmune diseases based on sex and age, showing that autoinimune diseases progress from an acute pathology associated with an inflammatory immune response to a chronic pathology associated with fibrosis in both sexes. Autoimmune diseases that are more prevalent in males usually manifest clinically before age 50 and are characterized by acute inflammation, the appearance of autoantibodies, and a proinflammatory Th1 immune response. In contrast, female-predominant autoinimune diseases that manifest during the acute phase, such as Graves' disease and systemic lupus erythematosus, are diseases with a known antibody-mediated pathology. Autoimmune diseases with an increased incidence in females that appear clinically past age 50 are associated with a chronic, fibrotic Th2-mediated pathology. Th17 responses increase neutrophil inflammation and chronic fibrosis. This distinction between acute and chronic pathology has primarily been overlooked, but greatly impacts our understanding of sex differences in autoinimune disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available