4.6 Article

A role for the receptor for advanced glycation end products in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 3, Pages 583-591

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070569

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL110166, R01HL073745, R01 HL073745, R01 HL063700, R01HL063700] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [F30 ES013621, R21 ES013986, F30ES013621, R21ES013986] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severely debilitating disease associated with a dismal prognosis. There are currently no effective therapies for IPF, thus the identification of novel therapeutic targets is greatly needed. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of cell surface receptors whose activation has been linked to various pathologies. In healthy adult animals, RAGE is expressed at the highest levels in the lung compared to other tissues. To investigate the hypothesis that RAGE is involved in IPF pathogenesis, we have examined its expression in two mouse models of pulmonary fibrosis and in human tissue from IPF patients. In each instance we observed a depletion of membrane RAGE and its soluble (decoy) isoform, sRAGE, in fibrotic lungs. in contrast to other diseases in which RAGE signaling promotes pathology, immunohistochemical and hydroxyproline quantification studies on aged RAGE-null mice indicate that these mice spontaneously develop pulmonary fibrosis-like alterations. Furthermore, when subjected to a model of pulmonary fibrosis, RAGE-null mice developed more severe fibrosis, as measured by hydroxyproline assay and histological scoring, than wild-type controls. Combined with data from other studies on mouse models of pulmonary fibrosis and human IPF tissues indicate that loss of RAGE contributes to IPF pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available