4.6 Article

A developmental model of sarcomagenesis defines a differentiation-based classification for liposarcomas

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 4, Pages 1069-1080

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070284

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 47179, P01 CA047179] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA047179] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of adult stem cells in the development of neoplastic diseases is becoming increasingly well appreciated. We hypothesized that sarcomas of soft tissue could he categorized by their developmental/differentiation status from stem cell to mature tissue, similar to the hematological. malignancies. We conducted gene expression analyses during in vitro differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into adipose tissue, as a representative mature connective tissue, and identified genes whose expression changed significantly during adipogenesis. Gene clustering and distance correlation analysis allowed the assignment of a unique time point during adipogenesis that strongly correlates to each of the four major liposarcoma subtypes. Using a novel gene expression strategy, in which liposarcomas are compared to their corresponding adipocytic maturing cells, we identified a group of genes overexpressed in liposarcomas that indicate the stage of differentiation arrest, ie, sharing a similar expression profile to adipocytic cells at a corresponding stage of differentiation, and a distinct set of genes overexpressed in liposarcomas that are not found in the corresponding stage of differentiation. We propose that the latter set is enriched for candidate transformation-associated genes. Our results indicate that a degree of developmental maturity can be quantitatively assigned to solid tumors, supporting the notion that transformation of a solid tumor stem cell can occur at distinct stages of maturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available