4.4 Article

Hidden unilateral agenesis of the frontal sinus: human cadaver study of a potential surgical pitfall

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 231-234

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.02.010

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aim of the study was to attract attention to the surgical significance of unilateral agenesis of the frontal sinus hidden by the overlapping expansion of the contralateral sinus toward the agenetic side. Materials and methods: Retrospective review of endoscopic transnasal sinus dissections of 55 human cadavers (42, formalin fixated; 13, fresh frozen) was done in a tertiary care academic medical center. Surgical and radiologic findings were noted. Results: Absence of right frontal sinus ostium in the presence of a connection between the right and left frontal sinuses was demonstrated in 2 (3.6%) cadavers. An absent and an incomplete septum between the frontal sinuses were also noted in these cadavers. No accompanying abnormality of other sinuses was found, and no evidence of previous sinus surgery was noted in these 2 cadavers. Conclusions: If one of the frontal sinus ostia cannot be found during sinus surgery, although this sinus and its recess can be seen on the thick-sliced coronal computed tomographic (CT) scans, keep in mind that it may be (3.6%) an agenetic frontal sinus hidden by the extensive pneumatization of the contralateral sinus that is crossing the midline. It may not be possible to foresee this variant preoperatively by endoscopic examinations or thick-sliced CT scans. If there is suspicion, thin-sliced CT scans with reconstruction will be ideal to confirm the agenesis of the frontal sinus and to avoid complications. In the presence of such variant of frontal sinus, 1-sided successful frontal sinusotomy is adequate because this sinus or cell will already be drained through the treated frontal recess. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available