4.6 Article

Presence of Foveal Bulge in Optical Coherence Tomographic Images in Eyes With Macular Edema Associated With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue 2, Pages 390-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.007

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592637] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To determine whether a significant correlation exists between the presence of a bulge in the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment (IS-/OS) line and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with resolved macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had a complete resolution of macular edema and had an intact IS/OS line in the central fovea in the spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic (SDOCT) images. Thirty-one eyes with macular edema associated with BRVO (BRVO group) and 31 unaffected fellow eyes (control group) of 31 patients were evaluated. In normal eyes, the intact IS/OS line determined by SDOCT has a bulge at the central fovea, called the fovea! bulge. The eyes in the BRVO group were classified by the presence or absence of foveal bulge, and the characteristics of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: A foveal bulge was present in 7 of 31 eyes in the BRVO group. The incidence of a foveal bulge was significantly lower in the BRVO group (22.6%) than in the control group (100%; P <.0001). All 7 eyes with foveal bulge had a decimal BCVA of >= 1.0 at the final visit. The incidence of a foveal bulge was significantly higher in eyes with BCVA of >= 1.0 (77.8%) than in the eyes with BCVA of <1.0 (0%; P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The foveal bulge is a good marker of the functional properties of the fovea in eyes with resolved macular edema associated with BRVO. (C) 2014 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available