4.6 Article

Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease and its Risk Factors in Visual Display Terminal Users: The Osaka Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages 759-766

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.040

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [2279192]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To investigate tear function and prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) in visual display terminal (VDT) users. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Six hundred and seventy-two young and middle-aged Japanese office workers who used VDT completed questionnaires and underwent dry eye testing. We estimated the prevalence of DED using logistic regression analysis to examine associations between DED and possible risk factors. The ocular surface feature, prevalence of DED, and risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 672 workers, 561 (83.5%, mean age: 43.3 +/- 9.1 years) completed the questionnaire. The percentage of women with a composite outcome of definite DED or probable DED was 76.5%, which was higher than that among men (60.2%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-3.10, P = .002). Workers over 30 years of age had a higher risk of DED (OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.06-4.66), as did workers using a VDT >8 hours per day (OR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.22-3.09). Average Schirmer value was 18.7 +/- 11.7 mm and tear break-up time (TBUT) was 4.0 +/- 2.5 seconds (78.6% of study participants had TBUT <= 5 seconds). CONCLUSIONS: DED is prevalent among young to middle-aged Japanese VDT users. Ophthalmic findings revealed short TBUT and corneal staining accompanied by normal Schirmer test values. Increased risk for DED was noted for women aged over 30 years and prolonged VDT use. Measures to modify the adverse impact of VDT use on the ocular surface may provide a positive impact on public health and quality of life for office workers using VDTs. ((C) 2013 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available