Journal
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 481-509Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107303349
Keywords
qualitative methods; evaluating qualitative research; publishing qualitative research; comparing qualitative and quantitative research
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A study of qualitative researchers who have submitted and/or published their research in top-tier North American organizational and management journals reveals the evaluative criteria-in-use at these journals. Specifically, when asked to take the perspective of an (a) author, (b) evaluator (reviewer or editor), and (c) judge of the comparisons between qualitative and quantitative research, three publication tensions were evident. The author offers the metaphor of fitting a round peg into an oval hole as a means of capturing these tensions and as a vehicle for organizing the various ways these tensions can be managed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available