4.6 Article

Three-dimensional evaluation of vitreomacular traction and epiretinal membrane using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages 509-517

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.014

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To delineate the 3-dimensional (3-D) relationship in vitreomacular traction (VMT) and idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Forty-eight evaluable eyes of 35 patients with VMT or idiopathic ERM were investigated with spectral. domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT). VMT was defined as focal if the diameter of the vitreous attachment was 1500 mu m or less and broad if it wag more than 1500 mu m. The 3-D OCT representation of vitreomacular interface abnormalities was evaluated. RESULTS: Focal VMT Was seen in five eyes. Broad VMT was seen in seven eyes. Of these 12 eyes, concurrent ERMs under the detached vitreous were seen in 10 eyes and zones of hyperreflectivity affecting the adjacent detached posterior hyaloid face were seen in 11 eyes. Eyes with focal VMT showed a foveal cavitation, whereas eyes with broad VMT had more widespread cystoid macular edema. Idiopathic ERM was seen in 36 eyes; 30 had complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), five had partial PVD associated with attached posterior hyaloid at some peripheral portion of the ERM, and one had no PVD. CONCLUSIONS: The SD OCT with 3-D image reconstruction provided unprecedented visualization of VMT and idiopathic ERM. The vitreous attachment to the macula can be subclassified into two subgroups, each having specific induced alterations in retinal anatomy. Most of the eyes with VMT had concurrent ERM, whereas several eyes with idiopathic ERM had attachment of the vitreous to some portion of the ERM, which suggests there is significant overlap between VMT and idiopathic ERM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available